Here is a hand that was sent in for review. Our reader is the dealer, sitting in the West position, turns up the jack of hearts. Their partner in East orders the jack into the dealer's hand. The score is 2 points for each team.
The outcome is E/W gets euchred. Is the euchre avoidable? Would you have played it differently?
Firstly, East should not be ordering up his partner's bower with 2 trump. I believe we all should be ordering up bowers from the 2 spot more than what is theoretically recommended with unknown P's becuz 99% of people pass too much and don't go alone enough. But everybody is aggressive in this game. Biddable hands are rarely passed and everybody has good loner vision. So in this setting ordering up your P's bower from the 2 spot with just 2 low trump + no off aces at 2-2 is simply a bad play. If the score were 9-9 or 8-5 or 9-6, then it's a good call but not 2-2.
Secondly, S1 needs to be leading trump in this spot. S1 has L+2 against a 2 seat order. The greatest advantage of a 2 seat order is the fact that his P is guaranteed to have at least 1 trump and almost always a void. S1 has the perfect hand to destroy this advantage. If the 2 seat has 3 trump as he should in this spot that means the dealer has only 1 trump, the Right. Leading trump and forcing out 2 trump from your enemy, including the Right, is a coup for S1's hand. If the 2 seat only has 2 trump there's still a great chance the dealer only has the right and the other trump is in S3's hand or the kitty. And if the dealer does have 2 trump, a trump lead can still force out the dealer's Right.
If the dealer had called trump instead of the 2 seat it's more debatable whether or not we should lead trump, but when the 2 seat calls, a trump lead with this holding is absolutely mandatory. Take away S2's greatest strength: knowing he has a P with at least 1 trump + 1 void, especially when S2 orders up the Right, and especially when S2 will order with 2 trump.
Ok now onto the actual hand.
(Edit: just to be clear, the first 2 tricks are completely standard and undebatable, the dealer trumps in and sends the Right)
Could the dealer have played this hand in such a way as to avoid getting euchred. Well one could say, yes, if the dealer double leads the boss Qs after he takes the first 2 tricks, his team will never get euchred. Problem solved. But that would be results oriented thinking.
The real question is, can we reach that result through logical deduction and thus distill this information into a strategy we can use in the future in a similar spot. And the answer is surprisingly yes. I say surprisingly becuz I would've played the hand exactly as the dealer had.
So here's the logic: If you know your P may order your bower with 2 trump, and S3 shows void in trump on your Right bower lead, this opens up the possibility that S1 could be loaded in trump and the easiest way to combat that possibility is to immediately put S1 in a squeeze by double leading the boss Qs. S1 will usually not be able to escape this squeeze unless he has Ace-Left in trump. On a bad day this play will backfire as S1 will trump in and your P will unluckily have that final spade. But overall this play has the best chances of neutralizing S1 if he actually has the hand we fear, and this play also doesn't hurt our team if S1 doesn't have it since a double lead boss Qs is a fine lead after trump has been played especially with S3 out of trump. So we get the best of both worlds with this lead, protection against that S1 monster we fear at virtually no strategic cost.
To reiterate, this logic is only activated IF 2 conditions are simultaneously met:
1) S2 can order your bower with 2 trump
And
2) S3 shows void on your Right bower lead.
If S2 only orders your bower in that spot with 3 trump+, then S1 can never be loaded, so leading the Ac is fine. If S3 plays a trump on your Right bower lead than that also means S1 cannot be loaded in trump even if S2 ordered with just two.