Standard call. S3's bold bag pays off. That said, if S3's P is not always calling something in Rd 2 veering towards Next when he doesn't block reverse Next, this bag will not be +EV. One has to have a lot of trust in their P to "make money" on this play. This is certainly a hand (S3's) I wanna test soon.
I believe this call will be +EV but I'm not certain. Another hand I gotta test. The dealer discarded incorrectly however.
With no voids this is probably a -EV call (Another hand I gotta test) that S2 should not be making down 0-2. This is the kind've call I have certainly been making but now I think I need to eliminate this one from my game. Recent samples on other better hands suggests this hand won't make the +EV cutoff.
That said, this is still a call I will be making all the time on the app or in real life with P's I can't trust (which means like 99% of P's out there). Why? Becuz I'm not convinced it's -EV with P's who pass biddable hands. Also, just becuz this call is -EV doesn't mean S2 should not be making this call quite often in a tough game. Obviously in any close out spot like being up 9-5, this is a MUST call by S2, but perhaps even up 4-1 this is a call. Blocking no suits, up 3+, the insurance is probably worth it with a "best I got" 2 low trump + singleton green Ace + no voids, slightly -EV hand.
I think it's a +EV call but I have to test it to be sure. I don't like the dealer's discard tho. When one has the choice between discarding the QC or the QH, it is more advantageous for the dealer's team if he voids himself in the longest suit. So get rid of the QH not the QC.
Standard call. Can't pass that hand in a close out spot. Even if it was -EV it wouldn't matter. It's a must call for S2.
