Unread post
by raydog » Fri Nov 25, 2022 4:05 pm
I simulated this hand and got interesting results:
I fixed S1's hand and the turn card, and only considered hands where S4 bid S with partner (26,230 hands of 100,000).
lead 10C: (3,784 / 16,481 / 5,865) [sweep / 1 pt. / euchred] EV = +0.47
lead AD: (3,382 / 16,970 / 5,778) EV = +0.47
lead QS: (6,182 / 16,376 / 3,572) EV = + 0.83
(all these results from the perspective of S4)
So I essentially found it's virtually a toss-up between leading the 10C and the AD. Lot's of competing scenarios, and they seem to balance out. I had a look at a few hands where my simulator found different results for the two leads (one or the other being better) and it seemed to be playing the hands correctly. Here are a couple of examples:
S2: 10-9H + A-K-9C
S3: A-10H + JD + Q-JC
S4: A-9S + K-JH + 10D (discard 10D)
S2/S4 score a pt. if 10C led, get euchred if AD led
S2: JS + 10H + Q-JD + KC
S3: K-QH + A-J-9C
S4: A-9S + JH + 10D + QC (discard 10D)
S2/S4 get euchred if 10C led, score a pt. if AD led